I was reading another depressing article about Europe’s debt
the other day (this one was about
Italy) when I realized that I had not published my perspective of the sovereign
debt situation. Many folks think that a
country’s sovereign debt problems should be gauged by the sheer amount of money
they owe. However, a simple analysis of
Italy ($2 trillion) and the United States ($10+ trillion) (not to mention
Greece’s debt is less than Italy’s) shows that the debt problems associated
with a country are not related merely to how much is owed. I believe the two largest indicators are debt
as a percentage of GDP and investor demand for debt.
DEBT TO GDP: AN ANALYSIS
GDP is the output or amount a country produces and
represents one of the broadest measures of a country’s economic health. It is therefore fair to measure a country’s
default risk by determining what percentage of their output is needed to cover
their debt. Historically, countries that
approach 100% debt to GDP (meaning their debt equals their GDP) have had
sovereign debt problems. Some notable
countries and their debt to GDP ratios were as of 2009:
Country
|
Debt % of GDP
|
Japan
|
189.3%
|
Italy
|
115.2%
|
Greece
|
113.4%
|
Iceland
|
107.6%
|
Israel
|
78.4%
|
Hungary
|
78%
|
France
|
77.5%
|
Portugal
|
76.9%
|
Canada
|
75.4%
|
Germany
|
72.1%
|
United Kingdom
|
68.1%
|
Brazil
|
60%
|
India
|
58%
|
Spain
|
53.2%
|
United States
|
52.9%
|
Based on these numbers, we should be in a panic about Japan
and Italy. But why then were we in a
panic about Greece, Iceland, and Spain first?
Why, as well, are we talking about the debt situation in the U.S. which
is at 52.9% and below the global average of 56%? The reason that these things have not
happened yet is because of the second force behind sovereign debt, market
demand.
MARKET DEMAND FOR DEBT
With equity markets around the world suffering, investors
have turned to purchasing debt, which provides a usually guarantee return on
investment. The reason why Japan at nearly
twice the debt over GDP has not been zeroed in on yet, is because so much
Japanese debt is purchased by the citizenry.
Japan (until recently) had an extremely healthy savings rate amongst its
population. This savings was converted
into purchases of government debt. This
is the only reason that their economy survived its failed spending spree after
the recession of 1990.
Based on this analysis, however, Japan’s day in the debt
spotlight is coming. Other countries
(like Spain) are seeing problems because investors are looking down the road
and seeing massive amounts of debt to be issued either through friendly
unemployment compensation (20% are unemployed and growing) or growing pension
problems.
In the United States, we can take the Obama administration’s
debt projections through the middle of the decade and use a 2.5% annual GDP
(which is a higher than expected figure) to determine where the debt to GDP
ratio for the United States is heading.
This chart assumes no recession between now and 2016,
however, let’s assume that we have a mild recession in 2014 with a decent
rebound in 2015 and NO increase in government spending as a result, along with
3% growth this year (instead of 4%) and 2% growth in growth years up to 2013
(instead of 2.5%).
These numbers all assume a better than expected recovery, a mild recession with no government “stimulus,” and that the government will meet the massive increases in revenue it projects. In looking at these numbers, it’s obvious that on a debt to GDP basis, things are not looking well. However, from the prospect of market demand, we have to ask ourselves, whose going to finance/buy all this new debt? I never thought the Europeans would get the message before the Americans via “austerity,” but that appears to be the case. The only thing that can stop this debt madness is a voting booth.